RCAA Library
Welcome
to the RCAA Library. The library contains articles,
studies, and presentations on airport pollution and
expansion issues generally and on the proposed Sea-Tac
Expansion in particular. The documents listed below
are only a small part of RCAA's extensive print library.
Contact the RCAA office for
more information. A complete list, year by year,
of the print library's contents is in preparation & will
be posted here shortly. In order to read documents
in Adobe Acrobat format, go to Adobe.com and
download the free Adobe Acrobat reader.
This is our Former
Library Page that is no longer updated.
It
has been replaced as of Feb 2004 with a new
page. Click here to
go to our new page. Thanks.
The library is organized into the following sections:
(To return to this section list, click
on the section head.)
- Flying
Off Course Environmental Impacts of America's AirportsThis
online report examines the noise, ground-level air
quality, water pollution and other issues associated
with America's airports. The information
is excerpted from NRDC's print publication, Flying
Off Course, published in October 1996.
- Breathtaking
Premature Mortality Due to Particulate Air
Pollution in 239 American Cities; National Resource
Defense Council - May 1996
- Airport
Pollution - Frequently Asked Questions: The Natural Resources Defence Council; October 1996
- Williams, Beth.,
M.S.A. Air Pollution: A Study with Particular Reference
to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
; RCAA White Papers, Book 1. (Reviews air and toxic
pollutants commonly found in airport communities and
their effects on health and the environment. Summarizes
1991 Washington State Department of Ecology Study
and the lack of a monitoring program at Sea-Tac.)
- Health
Effects Notebook for Hazardous Air Pollutants,
United States Evironmental Protection Agency (EPA), Dec, 2003
- Federal
Aviation Administration. 2001 Airport Capacity
Benchmark
Report [acrobat 4.19MB]
Report shows no delay problem at Sea-Tac Airport and
does not forecast a problem anytime soon.
- Gerald Bogan, Presentation
on Weather & the LDA landing technology to the
Puget Sound Regional Council Expert Arbitration Panel.
For RCAA. March 1995. (Shows that "needs" claimed
by the Port of Seattle for a 3rd runway based on false
weather assumptions.)
- Testimony of Dr.
Stephen Hockaday before the Subcommittee on Aviation
of the House of Representatives Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure.
Dr. Hockaday, an authority on separation of landing
aircraft in instrument weather conditions, points
out that the Port's figure of 44% poor weather does
not match the FAA definition of poor weather and is
incorrectly calculated. According to Hockaday, IFR
conditions only occur 7.9% of the year, and as little
as 3% percent of the time during peak demand when
the third runway would be used. LDA technology could
inexpensively be used. He criticizes the third runway
crossing active runways to reach the terminal as a
source of congestion and safety problems. Finally,
he points out that conflicts between Boeing Field
and the third runway would eliminate most of the benefits
of the third runway.
- 2002,
July Presentation to House of Representatives on Alternatives
(ACC, Hockaday)
- Puget Sound Regional
Council Expert Arbitration Panel, Final Decision on
Demand Management. Dec. 8, 1995. Final Decision.
Urges region to look a high speed rail, does not find
demand management alone adequate due to disinterest
by Port and WSDOT. [Acrobat
file 18 KB]
-
A Brief
History of Regional Air Transportation Planning in
Washington State 1942-1997.
(This section discusses projected socio-economic
impacts of Sea-Tac expansion including changes in land
uses, impacts on home ownership, local government revenues,
impacts on residential property values and property tax
revenues, effects on community facilities and services,
educational impacts on children as well as impacts on
School District revenues. This section recommends steps
to mitigate community impacts associated with Sea-Tac
expansion.)
- Helmuth, Obata
+ Kassabaum, Inc. -- ;Dallas, Texas; Raytheon Infrastructure
Services, Inc. -- ;Denver & Philadelphia, in association
with Thomas/Lane & Associates, Inc. -- ;SeaTac
International Airport Impact Mitigation Study: Initial
Assessment and Recommendations, February, 1997. Executive
Summary. Prepared under a grant from the State of
Washington. Reviews the costs of mitigating
noise, transportation, property loss, tax loss, and
school impacts of the proposed third runway at SeaTac.?
- Helmuth, Obata
+ Kassabaum, Inc. -- ;Dallas, Texas; Raytheon Infrastructure
Services, Inc. -- ;Denver & Philadelphia, in association
with Thomas/Lane & Associates, Inc. -- ;SeaTac
International Airport Impact Mitigation Study: Initial
Assessment and Recommendations, February, 1997. Section
9 Potential SocioEconomic Impacts and Mitigation.
- Helmuth, Obata + Kassabaum,
Inc. Dallas, Texas; Raytheon Infrastructure
Services, Inc. -- ;Denver & Philadelphia, in association
with Thomas/Lane & Associates, Inc. -- ;SeaTac
International Airport Impact Mitigation Study: Initial
Assessment and Recommendations, February, 1997. Appendix
A: Equity Issues and Socio-Economic Impacts.
This section of the HOK Report examines the economic
benefits and costs to the locally impacted communities.
It generally concludes that the communities shoulder
heavy costs for the impacts but receive relatively
small amount of the benefits from the airport.
Sea-Tac Airport is subject to both deep
earthquakes, such as the Nisqually quake of 2001. and
shallow earthquakes from the Seattle Fault zone which
is a just a few miles north of the airport. Shallow fault
earthquakes will cause considerably more damage that the
.68 quake of 2001 which wrecked the air control tower
at Sea-Tac and caused a large part of the KCIA runway,
built on fill, to sink and crack. There is concern that
the 170 foot high "great wall of Sea-Tac" that would be
built for the third runway would be subject to catastophic
failure covering wetlands and neighborhoods downhill to
the west of the walls. Such a failure could also destroy
parts of the second runway. Presently, there is a debate
on how much of the unstable soils under the present site
should be removed and what sort of a foundation is needed.
(See also, the wetlands section.)
- June 24 Power Point
Presentation [Adobe Acrobat 353KB]by Port Staff to Port Commission
on Cost Overruns
- June 24 Memo to
Port Commission on Cost Estimate Increases since last estimate in June 1999.
- Helmuth, Obata,
+ Kassabaum, Inc. , Dallas, Texas; Raytheon Infrastructure
Services, Inc., Denver & Philadelphia, in association
with Thomas/Lane & Associates, Inc., SeaTac
International Airport Impact Mitigation Study: Initial
Assessment and Recommendations, February, 1997. Executive
Summary. Prepared under a grant from the State of
Washington. Reviews the costs of mitigating
noise, transportation, property loss, tax loss, and
school impacts of the proposed third runway at Sea-Tac.
- Helmuth, Obata
+ Kassabaum, Inc., Dallas, Texas; Raytheon Infrastructure
Services, Inc., Denver & Philadelphia, in association
with Thomas/Lane & Associates, Inc., SeaTac
International Airport Impact Mitigation Study: Initial
Assessment and Recommendations, February, 1997. Section
9 Potential Socio-Economic Impacts and Mitigation.
(This section discusses projected socio-economic impacts
of Sea-Tac expansion including changes in land uses,
impacts on home ownership, local government revenues,
impacts on residential property values and property
tax revenues, effects on community facilities and
services, educational impacts on children as well
as impacts on School District revenues. This section
recommends steps to mitigate community impacts associated
with Sea-Tac expansion.)
- Helmuth, Obata + Kassabaum,
Inc., Dallas, Texas; Raytheon Infrastructure Services,
Inc., Denver & Philadelphia, in association with
Thomas/Lane & Associates, Inc., SeaTac International
Airport Impact Mitigation Study: Initial Assessment
and Recommendations, February, 1997.Appendix A: Equity
Issues and Socio-Economic Impacts. This section
of the HOK Report examines the economic benefits and
costs to the locally impacted communities. It generally
concludes that the communities shoulder heavy costs
for the impacts but receive relatively small amount
of the benefits from the airport.
- Lynn O. Michaelis,
Ph.D. General Comments to Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) [for Flightplan].
(Reviews basic economics of Sea-Tac expansion and
why it doesn't make economic sense.)
- Testimony of Dr. Lynn Michaelis
to the Aviation Subcommittee hearing on the third
runway at SeaTac Airport, March 18, 1996.
Noted economist Dr. Lynn Michealis points out that
the Ports pricing scheme encourages inefficient operation,
that the return on investment for the $500 million
runway is unacceptably low, and the the costs of operation
are being shifted onto the neighboring communities.
Comment letter to Army Corps/Ecology re Port of Seattle Section401/404, 2/2001
- RCAA Scoping Comments
to Draft Environmental Impacts Statement (DEIS). (A
good minitraining course in issues, as well.)
- RCAA Comments
on SeaTac Masterplan Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS). (without appendices)
- RCAA Comments
on SeaTac Masterplan Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS).
- Seattle Community
Federation Comments on SeaTac Masterplan
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
(Draft SEIS).
- Presidential
Executive Order #12898 on Environmental
Justice. [acrobat
20 Kb] The
purpose of Presidential Order #12989
is to focus attention
on federal agencies on the human
health and environmental conditions in minority
communities and low-income
communities with the goal of achieving environmental
justice (EJ);
to foster nondiscrimination in federal
programs that substantially affect human
health or the
environment;
to give minority communities and low-income
communities greater opportunities for public
participation
in,
and access to public information
on, matters relating to human health and
the environment.
- EPA Environmental Justice Page
- National
Archives and Reocords Administration, Electronic
Federal Code Search Page (Beta Site) This is an electronic version of the massive Federal Code. Parts concerning this issue are Part 150 & 161 (Noise & airports), Part 401 Water Quality and Part 404 Wetlands.
- Airport
Noise Law A very useful website with tons of well-organized
information US Federal and California law.
-
MOTION OF SIERRA CLUB, WASHINGTON TOXICS COALITION,
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY,
WASTE ACTION PROJECT, PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE,
RE SOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES,
CITIZENS FOR A HEALTHY BAY, CITIZENS AGAINST SEATAC
EXPANSION, KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP, COLUMBIA
RIVERKEEPER, OKANOGAN HIGHLANDS
ALLIANCE,
FRIENDS OF GRAYS HARBOR, OKANOGAN WILDERNESS LEAGUE,
AND THE LANDS COUNCIL FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR
AS AMICUS CURIAE [Adobe Acrobat file 142kb]
- Airport Communities Coalition
petition in the Supreme Court
of Washington, challenging the Port of Seattle's “dirty
fill bill” enacted in the regular session
of the Legislature.
- Seattle Community
Federation v. Federal Aviation Administration
April 1992.
- Gustafson v. City
of Lake Angeles, February 1996.
- Declaration of
Helen D. Kludt, December 1995.
- City of Brook Park v.
City of Cleveland, Ohio, July 1995.
- Favro et al. v. Port
of Seattle. United States District Court Western District
of Washington at Seattle January 27, 1995. Order
issued by federal district court judge allowing residents
to sue to recover damages for the time period prior
to signing the Port of Seattle's Avigation Easement.
Truth
in Aviation Oct. 31, 2003 (Webletter Vol.
10, #2)
- Truth in Aviation Sept 25, 2003 (Webletter Vol.
10, #1)
- Truth
in Aviation Aug 19, 2003 (Webletter Vol.
9, #4)
- Truth
in Aviation July 19, 2003 (Webletter Vol. 9, #3)
- Truth
in Aviation June 27, 2003 (Webletter Vol. 9,
#2)
- Truth
in Aviation April 19, 2003 (Webletter Vol.9, #1)
- Truth
in Aviation March 3, 2003 (Webletter Vol. 8, #4)
- Truth
in Aviation January 22, 2003 (Webletter Vol. 8, #3)
- Truth
in Aviation December 17, 2002 (Webletter Vol. 8, #2)
- Truth
in Aviation November 12, 2002 (Webletter Vol. 8, #1)
- Truth
in Aviation September 12, 2002 (Webletter Vol.
7, #4)
- Truth
in Aviation August 12, 2002 (Webletter
Truth in Aviation Fall
2001 Vol. 7, #3)
- Truth in Aviation Fall
2001 Correction
- Truth
in Aviation Fall 2001
[Adobe Acrobat PDF Version] Vol. 7, #2
- Truth
in Aviation Summer 2001
[Adobe Acrobat PDF Version] Vol. 7, #1
- Truth
in Aviation Spring 2001
[Adobe Acrobat PDF Version]
- Truth
in Aviation Fall 2000 [Adobe
Acrobat PDF Version]
- Truth in Aviation
Summer 2000 (HTML version)
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Summer 2000 [Adobe Acrobat
PDF version]
- Truth in Aviation
Winter 2000 (HTML version)
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Winter 2000 [Adobe Acrobat
PDF version]
- Truth in Aviation: Newsletter of the RCAA
Summer 1999 (HTML version)
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Summer 1999 [Adobe Acrobat
PDF version]
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Winter 1999 (HTML version)
- Truth in Aviation: Newsletter
of the RCAA Fall 1998 (HTML version)
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Spring 1998 (HTML version)
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Spring 1998 [Adobe Acrobat
PDF version]
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Winter 1998
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Summer 1997
- Truth in
Aviation: Newsletter of the RCAA Spring 1997
- Truth
in Aviation: Newsletter of the RCAA Late Winter
1997
- Truth In Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Fall 1996
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Summer 1996
- Truth in Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Spring 1996
- Truth In Aviation:
Newsletter of the RCAA Late Winter 1996
- Truth in Aviation:Newsletter
of the RCAA Fall 1995
- Truth in Aviation
: Newsletter of the RCAA Summer 1995
- Report
of Port "Fly-Quiet" Committee, August 2003 [acrobat.pdf,
797kb]
- Resolution
of King County Council regarding Part 150 Noise Plan
for King County International Airport (Boeing Field)
- Comments
of the Regional Commission on Airport Affairs ("RCAA")
on the document titled "Aviation Noise Abatement Policy 2000", issued by the Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, and published at 65 Federal Register (no. 136) 43803 - 43825 (14 July 2000). The document is also known as FAA Docket 30109. Submitted October, 2000
- Airport Noise and Capacity
Act of 1990 (Federal)
- Helmuth, Obata
+ Kassabaum, Inc. Dallas, Texas; Raytheon Infrastructure
Services, Inc.- -- ;Denver & Philadelphia, in
association with Thomas/Lane & Associates, Inc.
-- ;SeaTac International Airport Impact Mitigation
Study: Initial Assessment and Recommendations, February,
1997. Section 9 -- ;Potential Socio-Economic Impacts
and Mitigation. (This section discusses impacts
of noise associated with proposed Sea-Tac expansion
on local government revenue, residential property
values and property tax revenues, effects on community
facilities and services, educational impacts of airport
noise on children as well as its impacts on School
District revenues.)
- Sound
levels (dB) and relative loudness of typical noise
sources in indoor and outdoor environments A
comparison of community noise levels from Federal
Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issuespublished
by the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (August
1992)
- Suter, Alice
H., Ph.D. Presentation to the [PSRC] Expert Arbitration
Panel (on behalf of RCAA), Nov. 1994. (Reviews
studies and shows airport noise more annoying that
other types of noise. Also shows how Port of Seattle
Noise Mediation & Nighttime Limitations Program
proposes a noise "reduction" that is within the margin
error rate of + 2 dB(A.) for the study, potentially
not an reduction at all.)
- Alice Suter H.,
Ph.D., Comments on the Port of Seattle's Statement
of Position (prepared for submission to the PSRC Expert
Arbitration Panel on behalf of RCAA) 30 October 1995.
(Shows that an 8-12 dB reduction is more likely to
be noticed by people than smaller reductions and Port
of Seattle's noise reduction program is inadequate.)
- PSRC (Puget Sound
Regional Council) Expert Arbitration Panel, Preliminary
Order on Phase II Noise Issues, 18 December 1995.
- Puget Sound Regional
Council Expert Arbitration Panel, Preliminary Order
on Phase I Noise Issues. Jan. 9, 1995.
- Final Decision
of the PSRC Expert Arbitration Panel on Phase II Noise
Issues. Puget Sound Regional Council, 1101
Western Ave. Seattle, WA 98104, March 29, 1996
The Expert arbitration panel in a 2 to 1 vote, rejects
the Port of Seattle's Noise Program.
- Flathers, George W.,
III. A Comparison of FAA Integrated Noise Model Flight
Profiles Observed at Seattle-Tacoma Airport. Document
DOT/FAA/EE8210. Prepared by the MITRE Corporation
for the Office of Environment and Energy, FAA, U.S.
Department of Transportation, December 1981 [excerpts].
(This study of actual flight profiles, as opposed
to idealized flight profiles used in the FAA 's INM
noise model, shows that the flight profiles used to
draw noise maps inaccurate for Stage 2 & 3 aircraft,
especially heavy weight aircraft.)
- Mitigation paper
#2 - Bad Noise Contour Predictions, By: Hans Aschenbach
M.B.A., Assistant Planner City of Des Moines, January
1993.
- RELATIONAL ANOMALIES
IN 'A' WEIGHTED AND LINEAR SCALE SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
ASSOCIATED WITH JET AIRCRAFT DEPARTURES , Errol
Nelson P.E., September 1996. Study of Noise Levels
produced from Jet Aircraft Departures.
- 65+ DNL Populations
Surrounding Nation's Busiest Airports. A
reproduction of a table provided by the Federal Aviation
Administration's Office of Environment and Energy
identifying the population surrounding each of the
nation's top 30 busiest airports exposed to DNL 65
dB and higher airport noise levels. A comparison of
the FAA data shows Sea-Tac airport ranks fifth worst
in the nation comparing impacted population versus
operations
- U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
Part 150 Noise Regulations. 14 CFR Part 150;
-
This is our Former
Library Page that is no longer updated.
It has been replaced as of Feb 2004 with a new page.
Click here to go to our new page. Thanks.
Background
Documents The
documents below are organized by date with latest
date on top. When several documents were issued
at about the same time and were related
(for example, a permit and appeal of the permit),
the documents were grouped together with a brief
explanation of the events.
Three principle
permits govern wetlands
affected by the Airport expansion and water pollution
from the airport: Section
401, Issued
by Ecology which certifies that the Port is complying
with
State Water Quality Standards: the Section
404 Permit, issued by the US Army Corps
of Enginners, which allows the Port to fill wetlands
to create
a 3rd runway; and the NPDES (National
Pollution Discharge Elimination certification, issued by
the Deparment of Ecology every five years. This
permit
allows major polluters to continue to pollute
in excess of what is allowed by the Clean Water
Act
of 1972, provided they meet conditions and follow
a timetable. The Airport's NPDES Permit came
up for renewal in 2002, but a new permit was not
issued
until September of 2003.
~~~
Opening, Response, & Reply Briefs On
Case before Washington State Supreme Court
on Pollution
Control Hearings Board Ruling and on Environmental
ACC appeal
concerning "Dirty Fill Bill". Opening briefs filed
September 11, 2003. Responses filed by October 18,
2003. Hearing November 18, 2003.
-ACC/CASE
Reply Brief
-ACC/CASE
Response Brief
-PCHB Response
Brief
-Ecology Response
Brief
-Port Response Brief
No. 73419-4
THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON Opening Brief of Petitioner Airport Communities Coalition
No. 73419-4
THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON Opening Brief of Petitioner Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion
No.
73419-4 THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON Opening
Brief of Port of Seattle
No.
73419-4 THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON Opening
Brief of Department of Ecology
No.
73419-4 THE
SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON Brief
of Environmental Organizations Amicus Curiae
~~~
NPDES Permit Issued by Washington
State Department of Ecology
on September 4, 2003.
Appeals due by October 2003.
10/06/03 Puget
Soundkeeper Alliance Appeal of Sea-Tac
Airport's NPDES Permit [acrobat
file, 133 kb]
10/__/03 Port
of Seattle Appeal of Sea-Tac Airport's
NPDES Permit [acrobat
file, 160 KB]
(10/5/03) Case/ACC
Appeal of Sea-Tac Airport's NPDES Permit [acrobat
file, 19 pages, 187 KB]
09/04/03 National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Waste Discharge
Permit No. WA-002465-1, State of Washington, Department
of Ecology [Acrobat.pdf,
88 pages 1.24MB]
09/04/03 Fact
Sheet on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Waste Discharge Permit No. WA-002465-1,
State of
Washington, Department of Ecology [Acrobat.pdf,
94 pages 2.56MB]
09/04/03 Summary: Responses to Comments on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Waste Discharge Permit No. WA-002465-1,
State of Washington, Department of Ecology [Acrobat.pdf,
32 pages 487KB]
~~~
The Section 404 Wetlands Permit,
Issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, was appealed
by the Airport Communities Coalition to
Federal District Court.
Judge Barbara Rothstein
dismissed the appeal in August, 2003, and
ACC filed
a Motion to Reconsider in September 2003
8/2003 Airport
Communities Coalition, Motion to Reconsider 8/19/03
Ruling
on Section 404 Permit Appeal
8/19/03 Decision,
U.S. District Court on ACC, State Attorney General
challenge of Armys Corps Section 404 Permit [acrobat.pdf, 4.92 mb, 43 pages]
07/22/03 Brief
of Amicus Curiae, Washington State Attorney General
in ACC challenge of Army Corps Section 404 Permit [Acrobat.pdf, 573KB, 11 pages]
~~~
Draft NPDES Permit was
issued for public comments, due 4/15/03
4/21/03 Comment
of RCAA on Draft NPDES Permit
2/28/03 Draft NPDES National
Discharge Elimination Permit (Comments due 4/15/03)
2/28/03 Public
Notice
2/28/03 Draft
Facts Sheet
~~~
US
Army Corps of Engineers Decision on Section 404 Wetlands
permit December 14, 2002. This
decision was issued in many sections listed below. (Except
where noted, the documents below are all in Adobe Acrobat
(.pdf) format.
Related
documents:
~~~
Section 401 Permit, issued by the Department of Ecology and Appealed to the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board. The Hearings Board ruled. The legislature attempted to override this ruling with the infamous "dirty fill bill." The ruling was appealed by the Port, the fill bill issue was folded into the case by the Washington State Supreme Court (See Sept. 2003)
Pollution
Controls Hearings Board Decision August 12, 2002
(134 pages)
Analysis
of Pollution Control Hearings Board 8/12/02 decision
on Section 401 permit application by
Kevin Stock Attorney for ACC (Airport Communities Coalition)
~~~
February
of 2001 comments on the Section 401-404 Permit Application
We are gradually getting
the comments up on the web. Paper copies of the comments
are available at the RCAA Office. Email RCAA
or call the office (206)824-3120 for a current catalog.
- Regional Commission on Airport Affairs (These
are general comments that cover the broad issues,
a good introduction)
- Airport Communities Coalition
(Consists of a variety of expert comments, well worth
reading)
- Individuals and other organizations (We have a large
number of comments from individuals and have selected
a sampling here of those that cover interesting issues
or provide special expertise)
December
of 1999 comments on the Section 401-404 Permit Application
- Regional Commission on Airport Affairs's Comments
on the permit application of the Port of Seattle for
a Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and a Section 401 permits from the Washington State
Department of Ecology. (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Reference No. 1996-4-02325)
- Airport Communities Coalition Comments on the permit
application of the Port of Seattle for a Section
404
permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
a Section 401 permits from the Washington State Department
of Ecology. (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Reference
No. 1996-4-02325)
The primary goal of the Clean Water Act
(CWA), 33 U.S.C. Sec.1251 et seq., is to "restore and
maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of the Nation's waters." In keeping with that goal, Section
404 of the CWA regulates the disposal of dredged and fill
material into "waters of the United States", including
wetlands. Activities which destroy wetlands, such as drainage,
flooding, pumping, and burning are regulated under the
CWA if they entail discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the U.S. The following links provide additional
information concerning wetlands.
|